Friday, Let Your Voice Be Heard.

At the offices of Mark Warner and James Webb. Harry Reid is planning on bringing up a vote on the Health Care Bill this Saturday. This Friday, make Webb and Warner think twice before voting for it.

As for the where and when:

Healthcare Protest Tomorrow - Noon-2pm. We hope to have a continuous chain of people between Webb's office at 507 E. Franklin and Warner's new office at 919 E. Main St.

If this helps, SEIU has a list of words that they use in trying to control the dialog. Words to use and words to avoid. Seeing how SEIU wants health-care that runs with all the efficiency as the DMV, look at the list and use the words avoid.

Reposted in full from the email:

Top-Line Facts:

• Budget Gimmicks: Whereas the taxes associated with the Reid (Senate) health care reform bill would start in 2010, the provision of health care benefits would not begin until 2014. In a ruse to make it appear that the tax revenues and costs associated with the bill balance, the government plans to collect taxes for each of the first ten years, but only provide services for the last six of those years.


• Spending: The cost of the bill is $2.5 trillion over 10 years of full implementation (2014-2023).


• Taxes Increases: Taxes will go up $493.6 billion—nearly half a trillion dollars.


• Medicare Cuts: Medicare will be cut $464.6 billion—another half a trillion dollars.


• Total Number of Pages: 2074


• Abortion: The bill permits the use of accounting gimmicks that will, for the first time, allow federal dollars to go to plans covering abortion. The bill does not include the Stupak language, and as a result, National Right to Life describes the Reid bill language as “completely unacceptable” and said it would “result in coverage of abortion on demand in two big new federal government programs.”


• Government Plan: The bill includes a government run plan and provides states with the possibility of opting out of participating in that plan. According to CBO, the government run plan “would typically have premiums that were somewhat higher than the average premiums for the private plans in the exchanges.”


• Employer Mandate: The bill will impose $28 billion in new taxes on employers that do not provide government approved health plans. These new taxes will ultimately be paid by American workers in the form of reduced wages and lost jobs.

Additional CBO Background:

• The bill would bend the federal cost-curve up. CBO says, “Under the legislation, federal outlays for health care would increase during the 2010–2019 period, as would the federal budgetary commitment to health care.” The coverage expansion would drive a net increase in government spending on health by $160 billion over 10 years.


• CBO scored the bill as reducing the deficit by $130 billion over FYs 2010-2019.

o However, CBO notes that the bill includes two budget gimmicks that hide the true cost of the bill. Doctors are assumed to get a 23 percent cut in 2011 which would carry into subsequent years. Fixing the SGR would cost $247 billion. Additionally, the CLASS Act generates $72 billion over the budget window, but later turns to deficits. Eliminating these two gimmicks means the bill would be $189 billion in the red. It would also put the real cost of the bill over a trillion dollars.

• The start dates for the individual mandate, exchanges, and employer penalties were all moved from July 1, 2013, to January 1, 2014.

o This is another budget gimmick to hide the true cost of the bill.

• 24 million people would be left without insurance.


• Unfunded mandates on the states: The bill mandates that states spend an additional $25 billion in Medicaid expenditures.


• Taxes on uninsured individuals would total $8 billion.


• Taxes on employers from the “free-rider” penalty would total $28 billion.


• 5 million Americans would lose their employer coverage.


• Cuts to Medicare include: Permanent reductions in the annual updates to Medicare’s payment rates for most services in the fee-for-service sector of $192 billion; $118 billion in cuts to Medicare Advantage; $43 billion in DSH cuts; $23 billion in unspecified cuts by the Medicare Advisory Board.


• Only 19 million people will get a subsidy to help them buy health insurance.

o None of the 162 million people with employer-based care will even be eligible for a subsidy.

• The government plan would have higher premiums than private plans. CBO said the government plan would “typically have premiums that were somewhat higher than the average premiums for the private plans in the exchanges.”

o With the opt-out provision, two-thirds of Americans are expected to have a government plan available in their state.

o Co-ops are included but would have “very little effect.”

• The CLASS Act would reduce deficits by $72 billion in the 10 year budget window, but “would begin to increase budget deficits” in the decade following 2029.


• The IRS would need $5-$10 billion to expand and implement the provisions in the bill.


• The costs of the subsidies in the exchange would grow at 8 percent a year.


• The tax on high value plans will quickly be applied to almost all plans. CBO expects the revenues from the Cadillac plan tax to grow at 10-15 percent per year outside the budget window.


• Includes a $15 billion “Prevention and Public Health Fund” slush fund.


• CBO says it would be “difficult” to maintain the predicted savings over a long period of time—meaning that the plan will likely run deficits when savings do not materialize.

Summary of Tax Provisions

	Baucus Bill	Reid Bill
Cadillac plan tax	$201.4	$149.1
Employer W-2 reporting of health benefits	Negligible	Negligible
Conform definition of medical expenses	$5.4	$5
Increase penalty for nonqualified HSA deductions	$1.3	$1.3
Limit FSAs to $2,500	$14.6	$14.6
Corporate information reporting	$17.1	$17.1
Requirements for non-profit hospitals	Negligible	Negligible
Pharma fee, effective 2010	$22.2	$22.2
Device manufacturer fee, effective 2010	$38.6	$19.3
Health insurer fee, effective 2010	$60.4	$60.4
Eliminate subsidy related to Part D	$5.4	$5.4
Raise 7.5 percent AGI floor to 10 percent	$15.2	$15.2
$500k deduction cap on pay for health insurers	$600 million	$600 million
0.5% HI payroll tax over $200single/$250married	Not included	$53.8
Section 833 treatment of certain insurers (the Blues)	Not included	$400 million
Cosmetic surgery tax	Not included	$5.8 billion
Individual and employer mandate penalties	$27 billion	$36 billion
Effects of coverage provisions on revenues *This number is not directly comparable in both scores	$83 billion	$70 billion
Other changes in revenue	$16.3 billion	$14.8 billion
TOTAL	$508 billion	$493.6 billion

Remember That 'Cash For Clunkers' Program?

How did that work out for you?



It’s not like there’s a market out there for Corvettes or anything like that. Or even a family who could have bought a used Volvo.

Anyway, the program is done for now and the numbers are in. And they are not good. C4C is functionally worse than the Broken Window parable. At least the kid broke the window on accident. The Clunker’s program encouraged people to purposely throw bricks through their windows, in a figurative way.

Cash for Clunkers was one of the more economically poor decisions in a long time

• By facilitating the purposeful destruction of the car’s engine, easily the most expensive part of the car.
• It eliminated the supply of secondary sales of said car.
• People would trade in good cars for the financial burden of a new car in the middle of the worst recession since Jimmy Carter.

Even by a green liberal standard, it was a bad policy. Used cars have already made their carbon footprint. By destroying the used car, the program had people buying new cars that came with a new carbon footprint. And when sodium silicate was poured into the engine, it would lubricate the pistons until it heated up and turned to glass, seizing the engine. If the program was really for the environment, recycling the engine and other parts would have been a better idea.

Not quite reduce, reuse and recycle.

Cross posted at The Richmond Liberty Alliance.

Sure, Now He's Worried About The Deficit. Updated and Bumped.

UPDATED: Found the current graph. Now with longer bars to indicate more debt.



Previously. . .
Keep in mind that:

• In 2007 and 2008, the Democrat party controlled both the Senate and the House.
• Barack helped with the budget for those two years.
• The Democrat controlled Congress helped craft TARP, all the bail outs and the Stimulus Package.
• Whatever Bills Obama signed into law at the start of the year, he helped create while he was a Senator that previous year.
• And he's said something like this before in the past and nothing has come of it. Far from it, in fact (from back in May of 09).

So now he's going to crack down on that pesky deficit. The same way the alcoholic will stop drinking after the liquor cabinet is empty.

Barack Obama plans to announce in next year's State of the Union address that he wants to focus extensively on cutting the federal deficit in 2010 – and will downplay other new domestic spending beyond jobs programs, according to top aides involved in the planning.

The president's plan, which the officials said was under discussion before this month’s Democratic election setbacks, represents both a practical and a political calculation by this White House.

On the practical side, Obama has spent more money on new programs in nine months than Bill Clinton did in eight years, pushing the annual deficit to $1.4 trillion. This leaves little room for big spending initiatives.
[. . .]
The big question for Obama – and the country – is whether the sudden concern about deficits will be more rhetoric than reality once his first State of the Union address concludes.

Nothing is stopping him now from trying to cut deficits. But seeing how he's never cut a budget in his life, only increase them, which can mean only one thing. He'll need to bring in more revenue, i.e., taxes. After all, this deficit is a crisis he 'inherited' and he needs to do something to fix the problem he created.

Quote For The Week: Indictment Of The Media Edition

But after reading the Washington Post's review of "Going Rogue" the other day and the reviewer's candid confession that she hadn't really had time to finish the book that she was writing so authoritatively about, we realized this is the latest thing in U.S. society and journalism.

Why bother reading any of it? Just talk about it.

Millions of Americans won't read "Going Rogue" and will think it's pretty good because they like SP. And millions more, like the Washington writer, are just as certain that it's conservative pop garbage, same as her. And they know this without cracking the thing open or turning page after page to the very end.

You don't even have to buy the book to know any of this.

So, a reviewer can just write what he/she thinks the book is or heard it is or wants it to be. And if no one else reads what they're writing about or reads anything they disagree with, who can challenge anybody on anything?

It's perfect for a hurried society, like Washington every day or the modern quadrennial presidential campaigns. People reciting at each other things they've heard from others.

This way nobody has to learn anything new or adjust what they're already certain of. Dumb is the new American smart.

Remember, We're 'The Extremists'

When you see videos like this, who are you going to believe? What the Left Wing Media says or what's in front of your very own eyes?

Fair. I Don't Think That Word Means What Nancy Pelosi Thinks It Means

Via Infidels Are Cool.



The proverbial 'Creeping Socialism' isn't creeping anymore as much as taking leaps and bounds.

Ace has more about the encroachment of our rights by Congress.

The left continues pounding the table, insisting that right-wingers are "paranoid" and "extremist" to call Obama a socialist, or to use totalitarian imagery in posters to protest his agenda. Why, it's just so not true! they bleat. You'd have to be a maniac like Sarah Palin to make these delusional claims! Why, it's like bad science-fiction!

Really?

Socialism never attends a party without an escort of coercive state behavior. It is a historic fact -- indeed, an economic fact -- that as the state seeks to regulate and control more and more economic activity, they must, of course, control more and more human activity.

Civics In Ten Minutes

It's a bit oversimplified but how much nuance can you get into studying governments throughout history in ten minutes? Stick with it for the entire length.



Donald Douglas has a bit more about the political spectrum here.

Barney Frank: Exposed!

Maybe 'Exposed' was a bad choice of words.

Thanks to Jim.